Solicitor Scarlett Wilson’s Statement Regarding the Death Certification of Jamal Sutherland by the Coroner

On Tuesday, the Charleston County Coroner’s Office amended Jamal Sutherland’s death certificate to classify his manner of death as a homicide. Sutherland died on January 5th while in custody at the Al Cannon Detention Center.

In response to this news, Ninth Judicial Circuit Solicitor Scarlett A. Wilson released the following statement:

“In criminal prosecutions, the Department of Health and Environmental Control’s death  certification is not evidence and is typically not part of our case. In the case of Jamal Sutherland, as of early this  morning, I had neither the original death certification nor the amended. This is not unusual.

When I first saw the video footage of Jamal Sutherland’s death, I fully expected Dr. J.C. Upshaw Downs, the  Coroner’s pathologist, to rule it a “homicide.” While I was surprised that Dr. Downs did not deem the manner of  death a “homicide,” neither his ruling as to the manner of death, nor the Coroner’s, is of great value in a criminal  investigation or prosecution. The word “homicide” is not equal to or synonymous with any crime in South  Carolina. Many prosecutions move forward when a manner of death is “undetermined,” and sometimes cases  deemed a “homicide” are not a crime. In fact, the National Association of Medical Examiners notes that the term  “homicide” with regard to a death certificate is a “neutral” term that does not indicate or imply criminal intent, a  determination within the authority of legal processes. (For reference, see the National Association of Medical  Examiners, A Guide for Manner of Death Classification (1st ed. 2002). I have discussed this in detail with the  Sutherlands.

Of greater import in my investigation and consideration of prosecution is Dr. Downs’ finding that the cause of  death was the result of Sutherland’s ‘excited state with adverse pharmacotherapeutic effect during subdual process.’ He further stated that his review of the extrication process did not reveal any ‘unusual or excessive interactions or areas of direct concern.’

As I previously stated, I have sought a second opinion as to the autopsy results. Dr. Kim Collins, a renowned and board certified forensic pathologist, is performing the review. While her work is incomplete, I expect a finding  of homicide. She is still investigating any ‘pharmacotherapeutic effect’ and its role in Sutherland’s death. It is  our understanding that the coroner has requested additional forensic testing which may bear on this issue for both  Dr. Downs and Dr. Collins. Determining the cause, rather than medical manner, of death is critical in prosecuting  someone for the death of another.

In order for the State to hold someone criminally responsible for another’s death, the State must not only prove  the proximate cause of death but also that the accused had the requisite criminal intent while acting unlawfully.  In order to determine this, it is imperative that a well-qualified expert analyze the relevant video, policies,  procedures and training of those involved. I have sought the opinion of a use of force expert who specializes in  force within detention centers. I expect a thorough analysis and expert opinion regarding the use of force against  Jamal Sutherland in the near future.”

Share on Facebook

Tweet

Follow us